Just whom are they kidding? Not the dissenting judge, Chester Straub, who "said it is clear to him that New York City's current policy violates the Establishment Clause by sending the message that Judaism and Islam are favored while Christianity is disfavored." Indeed, the majority's reasoning is even more specious than it was in Roe v Wade. The plaintiff's attorney is licking his chops at the prospect of bringing the case before the US Supreme Court, whose two newest members are conservative Catholics. I share his enthusiasm.
Reclaiming Personhood in the Public Debate over IVF
-
[image: IVF clinic]
As we consider the future of our debate over IVF, we must go deeper than
the political questions facing us and ask ourselves fundamental...
2 hours ago