Just whom are they kidding? Not the dissenting judge, Chester Straub, who "said it is clear to him that New York City's current policy violates the Establishment Clause by sending the message that Judaism and Islam are favored while Christianity is disfavored." Indeed, the majority's reasoning is even more specious than it was in Roe v Wade. The plaintiff's attorney is licking his chops at the prospect of bringing the case before the US Supreme Court, whose two newest members are conservative Catholics. I share his enthusiasm.
Poverty Is a Path to Heaven
-
"My wealth is in the poor," says the wisdom of the Church, for in giving
over part of our goods to those in need, we participate in the spiritual
poverty o...
3 hours ago












