Just whom are they kidding? Not the dissenting judge, Chester Straub, who "said it is clear to him that New York City's current policy violates the Establishment Clause by sending the message that Judaism and Islam are favored while Christianity is disfavored." Indeed, the majority's reasoning is even more specious than it was in Roe v Wade. The plaintiff's attorney is licking his chops at the prospect of bringing the case before the US Supreme Court, whose two newest members are conservative Catholics. I share his enthusiasm.
The Week Ahead: Pope Leo XIV’s Latin American trip, US midterms and Supreme
Court
-
Pope Leo XIV visits Uruguay and Argentina as US voters head to the polls
and the Supreme Court hears a Catholic education case
2 hours ago












