Just whom are they kidding? Not the dissenting judge, Chester Straub, who "said it is clear to him that New York City's current policy violates the Establishment Clause by sending the message that Judaism and Islam are favored while Christianity is disfavored." Indeed, the majority's reasoning is even more specious than it was in Roe v Wade. The plaintiff's attorney is licking his chops at the prospect of bringing the case before the US Supreme Court, whose two newest members are conservative Catholics. I share his enthusiasm.
A problem with perfectly rational agents and decision theory
-
Suppose I am perfectly rational in the decision theoretic sense. A coin is
about to be tossed, and I will get five dollars on heads (*H*) and one
dollar ...
4 hours ago












