There's an interesting discussion of that question over at Right Reason. The post's author, Alexander Pruss, is certainly right to imply that love in the relevant sense, i.e. agape, cannot be merely a disposition. But neither do I think it right to say that agape entails no disposition to love, if indeed that's what is being said. I'd say that agape is fundamentally a kind of action which, when performed regularly, entails a non-necessitating habitus or disposition to act similarly.
The Rise of the Jim Crow Theobros
-
Bob Smietana, Religion News Service
Michael Spangler does not look like a white supremacist and antisemite.
He has no visible tattoos, no shaven head, no ...
4 days ago












