"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you odd." ~Flannery O'Connor

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

Independence, but from what?

Unfortunately, I find myself forced to agree with The Gonzman, though as a once-and-future academic I couldn't get away with putting things as he does. And considering the news constantly tracked by AFA, it's even timelier for today to repost, in slightly revised form, what I said one year ago.

On this day in 1776, the Founding Fathers signed a Declaration of Independence containing the following statement: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." On that basis, it was said that "the laws of nature and of nature's God" impelled them to "separation," thus forming the basis of the new republic. Thus, to those who so boldly risked their "lives, fortunes, and sacred honor" to found said republic, it was actually "self-evident" that there is a Creator who is also a Lawgiver! Such is the religious and moral foundation of the United States, whatever the other religious and philosophical differences among the Founders may have been.

That is why the direction of the Supreme Court for the last few generations, validated in the mainstream media and the universities as well as the legal profession, consists in an ever-firmer rejection of the very spiritual foundation of this Republic. Consider the following passage from the majority opinion in Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992), which prevented the overturning of Roe v Wade. It was quoted with approval by Justice Anthony Kennedy, an ostensible Catholic, writing for the majority in Lawrence v Texas (2003), striking down state anti-sodomy laws:
These matters, involving the most intimate and personal choices a person may make in a lifetime, choices central to personal dignity and autonomy, are central to the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life. Beliefs about these matters could not define the attributes of personhood were they formed under compulsion of the State.
What's the upshot? It is now a premise of constitutional law that government may no longer embody in positive law any "concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe"—i.e. any religion or philosophy—that leads, logically, to forbidding "intimate and personal choices" embodying a different concept. What the signers of the Declaration took to be the universal basis of natural rights is now viewed as a violation of such a right when applied in positive law to the most basic issues of human life. The result: the holocaust of abortion continues and the absurdity of gay marriage begins its encroachment.

The horror and filth is all around us. I pray that the new, Catholic members of the Supreme Court help to start turning all that around. Mary Immaculate, Patron of the Americas, pray that God's mercy change us.
blog comments powered by Disqus