There's an interesting discussion of that question over at Right Reason. The post's author, Alexander Pruss, is certainly right to imply that love in the relevant sense, i.e. agape, cannot be merely a disposition. But neither do I think it right to say that agape entails no disposition to love, if indeed that's what is being said. I'd say that agape is fundamentally a kind of action which, when performed regularly, entails a non-necessitating habitus or disposition to act similarly.
America's 250th Revives Questions About Religion and Founders
-
PBS
As the nation nears its 250th anniversary next month, Judy Woodruff reports
on how old questions about faith and the founding are once again being
pu...
11 hours ago












