There's an interesting discussion of that question over at Right Reason. The post's author, Alexander Pruss, is certainly right to imply that love in the relevant sense, i.e. agape, cannot be merely a disposition. But neither do I think it right to say that agape entails no disposition to love, if indeed that's what is being said. I'd say that agape is fundamentally a kind of action which, when performed regularly, entails a non-necessitating habitus or disposition to act similarly.
Federal Judge Indefinitely Blocks Trump’s Latest Layoffs
-
Federal Judge Indefinitely Blocks Trump’s Latest Layoffs
[image: Illustration showing Donald Trump's face and a gavel]
jessica.blake@… Wed, 10/29/2025 - 03...
2 hours ago












